The Surprisingly Scientific Way To ID Your 4 BIGGEST Relationship Issues
Means-goals relations analysis is a method of looking at relationships based on how well the partners help each other to achieve their life goals.
Each person is the means to the other’s goals. Relationships are analyzed according to goals theory, which basically states that:
means are assessed according to their instrumentality in reaching goals
means that are able to help achieve multiple goals are more highly valued
multiple means exist for each goal
inhibiting alternative means prevents their existence from diluting the perceived value of existing means
Mutual perceived instrumentality, or a relationship in which each partner is instrumental in helping the other to achieve his or her goals, is considered to be the most satisfying type of relationship.
We can break this concept down further to help solve existing relationship problems, and to anticipate and prevent future relationship issues.
Attraction and compatibility:
According to means-goals relations analysis, it stands to reason that people will be most attracted to, and most compatible with, those who share goal congruence.
That is, your ideal partner is actively working towards goals with which you can be of assistance, and can provide assistance with the goals that you are trying to achieve.
Your individual goals need not be the same, but they should fit well together in a complementary manner.
Likewise, relationships work best and are most satisfactory when both partners not only consider the other person useful, but feel like they are of use.
To keep your relationship strong, it is not enough to help your partner achieve his or her goals. You should also ask for assistance in reaching your own.
This leads to mutual perceived instrumentality, or the shared belief that you are good for each other.
Four common relationship problems, and how means-goals analysis can help to identify the source.
Relations-goals analysis also identifies areas in which many couples get stuck.
Using mutual perceived instrumentality as the ideal, and applying the principles of goals theory to relationships, it is easy to understand the basis for these common complaints:
1. Feeling unappreciated
Although means, or people, that can help achieve multiple goals are more highly valued, their individual contributions to each goal are devalued.
This can lead to a situation in which one partner feels that his or her hard work across multiple dimensions of family life is unappreciated.
Circular arguments often ensue, as the other partner might feel an overall appreciation for the person, but be unable to articulate any concrete thanks for a specific task.
2. Shifting priorities
People are not static, and our goals shift and change over time.
It is important that partners remain flexible and willing to support each other’s newly identified goals.
However, challenges can arise when partners grow in new ways that are very different from each other, and begin to have trouble valuing — or even understanding — each other’s new goals.
Open communication is key to negotiating these shifts.